Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on unlawful gambling.

No, they weren’t personally in presence, however the world-famous celebs were conspicuously included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments – the controversial websites using both free casino-style games and lucrative rewards, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can ‘bet free,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to discuss claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as conventional casinos, only without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t subject to regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings in 2015 alone. Now the company faces allegations of unlawful sports betting in a New york city suit that claims VGW uses star endorsers to ‘create a veneer of legitimacy’ around its product. (See VGW’s declaration below)

‘I’m not sure” if you don’t trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton” is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebs from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom use any distinctions in between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of numerous sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where lots of – however not all – video games are complimentary

Drake has a deal with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely touts on social media

Learn more

Donald Trump ‘set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, ads usually center around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the capacity for real gambling losses.

Others tempt customers with guarantees of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement displaying Drake’s cars and trucks, planes and estates before pivoting to video of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

‘Daddy, why do we have so much money?’ read the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: ‘Because I never gave up.’

The discrepancy between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they’re not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, many of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.

‘Most social sweeps clients never buy,’ the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling websites.’

Social gambling establishments offer clients an opportunity to play casino-style games with buddies. Players have the choice to purchase valueless currency frequently referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be utilized to open various features within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling consumers to acquire other currency known as ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad displaying Drake’s automobiles, aircrafts and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all however seven states, which has assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require generally need recognition. However, websites like Chumba will request for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable customers to send mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully particular instructions. What’s more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, thereby providing a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of casino video games for a chance to win – or lose – real cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their support.

‘Social sweepstakes video games are simply a type of online home entertainment,’ an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. ‘No purchase is required to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever have to spend for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement – or” factor to consider” – is an essential difference in between social sweeps and traditional online gaming websites like gambling establishments.’

Think about the method that McDonald’s utilizes its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to gamble, however rather they’re purchasing hamburgers and french fries that use them the opportunity to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘factor to consider’, the game itself doesn’t meet the meaning of gaming in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all type of everyday services in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement stores,’ the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promotions are frequently utilized by a who’s who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to lots of gambling market insiders, that argument doesn’t cut it.

For starters, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald’s Monopoly game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, therefore suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They don’t last permanently and they’re typically not connected to casino-style games of opportunity,’ Wallach informed DailyMail.com. ‘They’re just money giveaways.

‘The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the qualities commonly related to McDonald’s-design sweepstakes promos,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos use” casino-like” payouts, typically 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the normal payout percentage for a temporary marketing sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the income earned by the company [normally less than one percent]’

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the web coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, providing consumers the possibility to play casino-style games for real rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have because been shuttered over claims of illegal gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous celebrity spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos must deal with comparable scrutiny.

‘These distinctions are not arbitrary,’ Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. ‘They have consistently been pointed out by courts and state lawyer generals as key elements in identifying that a sweepstakes promo was in fact a guise for unlawful sports betting.’

Among the gambling establishment market’s leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact new legislation on the concern.

‘Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up significant tax and revenue opportunities as this gaming replaces that performed through channels,’ checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the newest suit, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an ‘unlawful gambling enterprise. ‘

Apple and Google have also been called as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com’s ask for remark.

‘We generally don’t discuss matters before the courts,’ a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com by means of email. ‘However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been filed with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

‘We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we operate, and stay positive about the future,’ the spokesperson continued. ‘We continue to provide our free-to-play games across most of North America, as we have for more than a years, creating not only terrific video games, user experiences and entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done securely, properly and at the greatest level of requirements.

‘More broadly, we ‘d repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are reasonably typical throughout the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to strongly defend any claim which might be brought against us.’

The concerns between standard online gambling and sweepstakes casinos might prove problematic for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both back VGW’s Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering ‘sweeps’ websites while at the very same time the leagues wish to predict a strong position against unlawful gambling – specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic sports betting scandal,’ Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably illegal sports betting sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,’ Glaser added.

Neither an NBA representative nor the gamers’ representatives responded to DailyMail.com’s ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also overlooked to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have an obligation to discuss to clients the distinctions and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

‘We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,’ the spokesperson said. ‘Some of our values are” our players precede” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

‘Celebrities who provide their names to shady illegal gambling websites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at threat along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare damage,’ Glaser stated. ‘There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state chief law officers rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with unlawful gambling.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton